Welche neuen Blockbuster versprechen viel und taugen wenig? Was gibt es Neues im Actionfilmsektor?
-
StS
- Actioncrew
- Beiträge: 28290
- Registriert: 04.10.2005, 21:43
- Wohnort: Harsh Realm, Hannover
Beitrag
von StS » 25.09.2012, 13:43
SFI hat geschrieben:imdb rating liegt momentan bei hohen 7,8. Ein Film, bei dem sich wohl keiner so richtig erklären kann wie die durchweg guten Kritiken und der Boxoffice Flop zusammen passen!
Naja - die, die ihn sehen wollten, haben ihn sich auch angesehen und fanden ihn gut.
Das Einspielergebnis (inklusive 3D-Zuschlag, wohlgemerkt) ist aber auch fatal ausgefallen. Zumindest haben "End of Watch" und "House at the End of the Street" gepunktet...
-
tech-c
- Action Prolet
- Beiträge: 2070
- Registriert: 05.10.2006, 12:33
- Wohnort: Forum
-
Kontaktdaten:
Beitrag
von tech-c » 25.09.2012, 14:37
soweit so klar, aber dann sollte es auch nächste Woche dank Mundpropaganda etc. aufwärts gehen.
[Ungedecktes] Papiergeld kehrt immer wieder zu seinem inneren Wert zurück: 0
-
freeman
- Expendable
- Beiträge: 61454
- Registriert: 12.12.2004, 23:43
- Wohnort: Rötha
Beitrag
von freeman » 26.09.2012, 09:14
Na ist doch leicht erklärbar: Gute Kritiken dank vielen Presseterminen, wo kein Eintritt gezahlt wird
;-)
Den Rest erklären Filmtauschbörsen ;-)
In diesem Sinne:
freeman
-
StS
- Actioncrew
- Beiträge: 28290
- Registriert: 04.10.2005, 21:43
- Wohnort: Harsh Realm, Hannover
Beitrag
von StS » 25.07.2013, 17:42
-
StS
- Actioncrew
- Beiträge: 28290
- Registriert: 04.10.2005, 21:43
- Wohnort: Harsh Realm, Hannover
Beitrag
von StS » 13.01.2015, 06:17
Eine Fortsetzung ist weiterhin "tot"...
IGN caught up with director Alex Garland, who offered an update on the proposed film.
“As far as I’m concerned? Yeah, it is [dead],” said Garland. “My hope is, and I actually think this will happen – somebody else will do it. Not to be all coy and silly about it, but I think our film was better than the first one, right? Just to be blunt. And the job of the next people is to make their film better than ours. And then if they do that, then finally, maybe this character will break out in the way that it deserves to. But we’ll see.”
As for the fan petition to get the film made…
“It makes me feel sad really. I feel grateful to the people who’ve attempted to get a sequel off the ground. And sorry that actually what happened was we let them down. Because the reality is that a film needs to acquit itself. It shouldn’t need a petition. And the truth is if it gets to the point where it needs a petition, it’s in big trouble anyway. That’s the cold, hard reality of it. I feel a sense of residual guilt. It’s quite strong actually; it’s not that residual. Dredd was a very, very hard movie to work on, for all sorts of different reasons, and the reward would have been at the end of it that it all worked out. But it didn’t all work out. That’s the reality.”
So what would Garland’s sequel look like if it did happen?
“The first film we made it for about $35m, although quite a lot of that was to do with shooting it in 3D. Or a chunk of it. And we managed to make that film for that budget by locking it in a building essentially, sort of Die Hard-style. In the second film it was going to go out into the desert, which would be The Cursed Earth – people who know the comic book would know immediately what that means. And maybe throw some money at some key sequences. That’s how you do it I guess. I think we could have made it for another $30m, $35m type thing. We could have made it for $30m if we shot it in 2D. $35m maybe 3D I guess. Of that order. But the third one, that would have been more expensive because it would have been going back to the city and maybe bringing in some Dark Judges or something like that.”
-
freeman
- Expendable
- Beiträge: 61454
- Registriert: 12.12.2004, 23:43
- Wohnort: Rötha
Beitrag
von freeman » 13.01.2015, 09:16
Schade, hätte ich mir alles angeguckt!
In diesem Sinne:
freeman
Wer ist online?
Mitglieder in diesem Forum: Bing [Bot] und 5 Gäste